BELARUS

  • December 17, 2025
  • Countries
CONTEXT

BELARUSIAN MEDIA IN EXILE SINCE 2020

Following the crackdown on the independent media sector in the second half of 2021, most independent media left Belarus. It is estimated that at least 47 active independent media currently operate from exile (see definition and criteria), with up to 600 media workers who fled the country after 2020. Most of the Belarusian media in exile have found their new homes in Poland and Lithuania, from where they continue to serve Belarusian audiences, reaching up to 21% of the population inside the country.

While some of the media left the country due to the political repression of 2020, most of the teams fled in the second half of 2021. This was related to three main reasons. First, due to the physical pressure on journalists and media at the end of 2020, when several media workers were put behind bars for covering protests. Second, the crackdown on the largest independent media TUT.by (now defunct), coupled with the detention of its employees, followed by the hijacking of the Ryanair flight with the journalist Raman Pratasevich on board, which not only demonstrated the capacities of the regime to prosecute journalists but also put aviation above Belarus on hold. Thirdly, a practice of recognizing independent media as publishing “extremist materials” or being “extremist formations” has also prompted relocation. Starting in 2021, this measure was used to criminalize the production and consumption of independent reporting in Belarus.

READ MORE

9.5

MILLION

According to The World Factbook, the currently estimated population of Belarus is 9.5 million people.

47

MEDIA OUTLETS

JX Fund is constantly tracking the development of 47 independent exiled media from Belarus, operating primarily from Poland and Lithuania.

2.6

MILLION

The independent Belarusian exiled media for 2.6 million YouTube subscribers, accounting for 27 million views in November 2025.

AT A GLANCE

INDEPENDENT BELARUSIAN EXILED MEDIA

Press Freedom

  • Press Freedom Index: 25.73 (166th out of 180 countries)
  • Freedom House Democracy Index: 7/100 – Not Free
  • Violence Against Journalists: The Belarusian state threatens the remaining independent media in the country by prosecuting them for cooperation with “extremist formations” and sentencing them to long terms in prison. Since 2020 at least 189 physical attacks and threats against journalists were reported. Currently, 27 journalists in Belarus remain behind bars. In September 2025, the Belarusian authorities released 12 Belarusian journalists and bloggers; all of them were forcefully transported to the border with Lithuania, where most still reside. Further, on December 13th, ​​Maryna Zolatava, editor-in-chief of TUT.by, was released and transported to Ukraine, along with the other 103 pardoned political prisoners. In December, RSE placed Belarus in fourth place among the countries with the most imprisoned journalists, and second, if counted per 100 inhabitants.
  • Administrative Measures: Over 4108 journalists since 2020 have faced judicial or economic attacks from the state. Independent media are recognized as extremist materials, which puts under administrative responsibility any news consumer. Administrative measures are used less regularly than criminal forms of prosecution.
  • Internet Censorship: 20 – Not Free (Freedom House: Freedom of the Net)
  • Internet Penetration: 92% (2023 est.) (CIA World Factbook) / 91.5% (2025 est.) (Datareportal)

Population & Demographics

  • Population: 9.5 million
  • Age Structure:
    • 0-14: 16,1.% (male 787,849/female 741,293)
    • 15-64: 66.1% (male 3,073,507/female 3,204,088)
    • 65+: 17.8%  (2024 est.) (male 572,483/female 1,122,231)
  • Religions:
    • Orthodox 48.3%
    • Catholic 7.1%
    • other 3.5%
    • non-believers 41.1% (2011 est.)
  • Languages:
    • Russian (official) 71.4%
    • Belarusian (official) 26%
    • other 0.3% (includes small Polish- and Ukrainian-speaking minorities)
    • unspecified 2.3% (2019 est.)
  • Literacy rate: 100% (2019 est.)
  • Income: GDP per capita: $29,000 (2024 est.)

All data by CIA, The World Factbook – Belarus

Media System in the Country

Since Belarus declared its independence, the Belarusian media sector developed in conditions of harsh censorship. In the 2000s the authorities launched the first wave of re-registration of media, which resulted in several independent media being shut down. Additionally, in the same period the Belarusian authorities for the first time exercised attacks on journalists, including the mysterious disappearance of the journalist Dzmitry Zavadski.

Since then, the country’s media system has been characterized as not free and censored by the state. None of the independent TV channels freely operate in the country, and the only satellite broadcaster Belsat, funded by the Polish government, was deprived of their right to work in Belarus.

Since the digitalization of the media sector, the media market saw a growth of independent reporting in the 2010s with dozens of new online media emerging in the country. Until 2020, many of the independent media had access to state institutions, accreditations to attend the official meetings, and funded themselves via advertisement services. The protests of 2020 and the subsequent wave of repression against the journalists laid a start to a new phase in the Belarusian media sector: imprisonments of independent journalists, criminalization of independent reporting, and relocation of most of the independent teams abroad.

As of December 2025, the Belarusian Ministry of Information’s register includes 359 printed newspapers, 511 journals, and 139 TV and radio providers . The number of registered entities has decreased over the last few years, with, for example, the number of newspapers and journals falling twofold.

At the same time, the country’s media sector comprises more actors represented by independent media in exile that were shut down and deprived of the right of free reporting in Belarus. The Belarusian media sector in the country survives under censorship and repression against media organizations and journalists.

Some of the independent media that remain in the country – heavily self-censored to remain under the radar – are deprived of the freedom of objective reporting on political and social affairs. Independent media in exile continue to deliver information to the audience inside the country, which has a high level of digitization and technical literacy.

While the “extremist materials” label puts content consumers under administrative responsibility, the label of extremist formation leads consumers and contributors to an immediate threat of criminal prosecution.

„In 2025, exiled Belarusian media outlets faced a new challenge on top of those they had already been navigating — the closure of USAID, whose funding had played a significant role in supporting independent Belarusian media. Nevertheless, our media sector has endured this year with resilience, and by the end of the year, there is a renewed sense of hope that we will be able to overcome this situation as well.“

Thinktanks-Belarus Expertise, 2025

FIGURES & TRENDS

MEDIA PROFILES

Belarusian independent media in exile are primarily focused on the national news agenda , although one-fifth work primarily on their region of origin. Media launches spiked during and after the 2020 protests, with 13 new outlets founded in 2020–2023. Many of the older outlets were also re-launched under new names highlighting the sector’s consistent political engagement.

Given that Russian is the primary language for a majority of the population, most independent media in exile publish in this language. However, a disproportionate amount of media have decided to have Belarusian-language versions (often, but not exclusively, in parallel to a Russian-language one), with almost a half of media publishing in Belarusian, which is consistently stigmatized by the Belarusian authorities.

Media are primarily focused on politics, news and society, in terms of topics, primarily publishing classical-text based journalism. However, there is also a significant use of investigative, online broadcasting and audio journalism, as well as short video formats, such as reels and shorts (Based on a review of media, in which experts had to allocate up to three defining tags to each publication, covering both format and topics that the media outlet was known for).

FIGURES & TRENDS

REACH & DISTRIBUTION

Independent media in exile continue to have a high level of consumption, as evidenced by the cumulative number of visits on the primary websites of outlets (due to the practice of using mirror sites, among others, this number may significantly undercount the actual volume of monthly traffic).

This does not necessarily translate into following media on social platforms, or liking posts, given that consumption of extremist materials or content produced by extremist formations can lead to administrative or criminal charges, respectively. As a result, many consumers try to avoid leaving traces of their media consumption habits either on public forums or on their phones, which can be assessed by law enforcement at random controls.

FIGURES & TRENDS

COMMUNITY

Prominent organisations working across the Belarusian media sector, helping carry out advocacy, organising collective actions, sharing learnings or insights, or providing research services.

„We are small, so the challenge is to survive in highly competitive landscape and to find your specific niche. Also – to find the right channel you can serve your specific audience. You have to understand their needs in situation you cannot be in the same place. So the challenge is to track local life through TikTok, Threads, Instagram – and not to lose connection, still breathing the same air with your audience, even being really hundreds of kilometres away.“

Hrodna.life, 2025

EXPERT COMMENT

PERSPECTIVES & PREDICTIONS

The Independent Belarusian media sector in exile has experienced major transformations since 2020. The political crisis in the country and the external political decision of the Lukashenka regime substantiated the consequences for the media sector. The number of independent media in the country has significantly decreased due to censorship and repression, which resulted in dozens of media employees sentenced to prison terms and hundreds of journalists leaving the country. By estimations of the Belarusian Association of Journalists, between 500 and 600 journalists were forced into exile.

To overcome censorship, several large independent media transferred their web pages to the clouds of Amazon and Google – the solution in practice prevents the Belarusian regime from blocking the webpages. Nevertheless, recent shifts in relations between the Belarusian authorities and US raise concerns about the long-term security and political reliability of these US-based cloud services. Additionally, to continue reaching out to Belarusians, the independent media proposed new forms of content, such as multiple TikTok channels and short video formats that reach audiences in the country.

As social media turned into the main source of new consumption for Belarusians, independent media face a challenge from the side of tech giants, such as Google, Meta, that prioritise content from state sources over independent media pages. To tackle that, the independent media continue to advocate for the support for their content distribution within the Belarusian informational space.

As the Belarusian expert Artyom Shraibman summarises: “Belarusian independent media have been agile in finding technical ways to minimise the effects of government attempts to block them. Taken together, these tools remain the most important source of free information for Belarusians, while the risks for individuals of accessing them is, in theory at least, relatively manageable.”

Despite the challenges posed by the Belarusian regime, the Belarusian independent media in exile have started to adapt their ways of working to the new circumstances and preserved a significant share of their audience, impacting the popularisation of the Belarusian language. At the same time, as the financial needs of the media in foreign countries increase, the pressure on media teams is also substantiated by a new financial model, leading to the outflow of media employees, and mental health issues. This worsened with the USAID financial cuts in 2025, when many of the media teams lost stable donor support, causing several YouTube projects to shut down and dozens of journalists losing their jobs.

Against the backdrop of organizational and external challenges, the Belarusian independent media, which have shown to survive over the so far harshest period of repression, require assistance from international stakeholders in advocating for their needs among private and public actors.

By Alesia Rudnik – PhD, Belarusian Political Scientist and Media Scholar

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

FURTHER READINGS

Reports

Academia

Press

Do you have questions or additional information that you want to share with us?

CONTACT US

 

This research was made possible by funding from the
German Minister of State of Culture and the Media.